Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Effects of Intravascular Contrast Media as Assessed by Thromboelastography

Omer Iqbal; Walter Jeske; Debra Hoppensteadt; Michael Koza; Jeanine M Walenga; Jawed Fareed; Rogelio Moncada

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1313628

Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Table of Contents

Semin Thromb Hemost 1995; 21(S 04): 086-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313628

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Effects of Intravascular Contrast Media as Assessed by Thromboelastography

Authors

Omer Iqbal
Walter Jeske
Debra Hoppensteadt
Michael Koza
Jeanine M Walenga
Jawed Fareed
Rogelio Moncada

Abstract

PDF Download

PDF (1065 kb)

References

References
1 Osborne ED, Sutherland CG, Scroll Jr AJ, Rountree LG. Roentgenography of urinary tract during excretion of sodium iodide. JAMA 80: 368-373 1923;
2 Almén T. Contrast agent design: Some aspects on the synthesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J Theor Biol 24: 216-226 1969;
3 King BF, Hartman GW, Williamson Jr B, LeRoy AJ, Hattery RR. Low-osmolality contrast media: a current perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 976-985 1989;
4 Robertson HJF. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 162: 621-622 1987;
5 Kopko P, Smith DG, Bull BS. Thrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 174: 459-461 1990;
6 Grollman JH, Chi C, Astone RA. Thromboembolic complications in coronary angiography associated with the use of non-ionic contrast media. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 14: 159-164 1988;
7 Gasparetti CM, Feldman MD, Burwell LR, Angello DA, Haugh KH, Own RM, Powers ER. Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coli Cardiol 18: 433450 1991;
8 Grines CL, Diaz C, Mickelson J. Acute thrombosis in a canine model of arterial injury: Effect of ionic versus non-ionic contrast media. Circulation 80 (Suppl 2) 411 1989;
9 Hwang MH, Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Giardina J, Pacold I. The potential risk of thrombosis during angiography using non-ionic contrast media. (Abstr.) J Am Coli Cardiol 11: 55 1988;
10 McClennan BL. Low-osmolality contrast media, premises and promises. Radiology 162: 1-8 1987;
11 Wolf GL. Safer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: How do we decide?. Radiology 154: 557-558 1986;
12 Committee on Drug and Contrast Media. The current efficacious use of water soluble contrast agents for intravascular injections. ACR Bull 44: 9-10 1988;
13 Bettman MA. Radiographic contrast agents—a perspective. (Editorial.) N Engl J Med 317: 891-893 1987;
14 Bagg MNJ, Horwitz TA, Bester L. Comparison of patient responses to high and low osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously. AJR 147: 185-187 1986;
15 Granger RG. Low osmolar contrast media. (Editorial.) Br M ed J 289: 144-145 1984;
16 Roberts CJ, Farron SC, Charney MC. How much can the NHS afford to spend to save a life or avoid a severe disability?. Lancet 1: 89-91 1985;
17 Fareed J, Walenga JM, Saravia GE, Moncada RM. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media?. Radiology 174: 321-325 1990;
18 Parvez Z, Moncada R, Fareed J, Messmore HL. Effect of nonionic contrast media (CM) on the components of coagulation and complement systems. Invest Radiol 18: 279-284 1983;
19 Rasuli P. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing non-ionic contrast media. (Letter.) Radiology 165: 582 1987;
20 Skalpe IO, Anke IM. Complications in cerebral angiography: A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate. Neuroradiology 25: 157-160 1983;
21 Jacobson PD, Rosenquist CJ. The introduction of low osmolar contrast agents in radiology: Medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. JAMA 260: 1586-1592 1988;